No end in sight to government shutdown after 'unproductive' White House meeting
The White House meeting, 
coming a day after the start of the federal government shutdown, served 
at least one purpose, in that key players in the debate gathered 
together in the same room for over an hour: Obama called it "useful," 
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said it was "worthwhile," and House 
Speaker John Boehner cast it as a "polite conversation."
But while the sides talked, there was no indication they agreed on anything or even shifted their views.
Senate Minority Leader 
Mitch McConnell, for instance, went so far as to call it "unproductive."
 Neither side discussed any potential compromises, with Obama and Vice 
President Joe Biden doing most of the talking and Boehner making clear 
he won't go forward with a "clean" funding bill -- with no Obamacare 
amendments -- a GOP congressional source said.
Republicans, led by tea 
party conservatives in the House, have demanded provisions to defund or 
delay Obama's signature Affordable Care Act be attached to any 
government spending plan, a strategy that Democrats have called a 
non-starter.
Moreover, the
 parties are on the verge of another crisis -- over whether to raise the
 debt ceiling by October 17, at which point the federal government won't
 be able to pay its bills.
"At times like this, the 
American people expect their leaders to come together to find ways to 
resolve their differences," Boehner said. "The president reiterated one 
more time tonight that he will not negotiate."
A few minutes later, 
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid claimed that it was Boehner -- not the
 president or his fellow Democrats -- who has refused to budge on 
budgetary matters, saying "we're through playing these little games."
Reid said Democratic 
leaders offered Boehner "a lifeline" by setting up negotiations "about 
anything that you want to talk about" so long as the House agrees to 
reopen the government first.
"I thought that they 
were concerned about the long-term fiscal affairs of this country. And 
we said, 'we are too. Let's talk about it,'" the Nevada Democrat said. 
"My friend, John Boehner ... cannot take yes for an answer."
In an interview with 
CNBC prior to the meeting, Obama said he was "prepared to negotiate on 
anything" regarding the federal budget -- but only after Congress passes
 "a clean piece of legislation that reopens the government" and allows 
the U.S. "Treasury to pay for things that Congress itself already 
authorized."
"Am I exasperated?" 
Obama said of Boehner, who is under pressure from fiscal hawks, and is 
refusing to let the House vote on the Senate-approved spending plan. "I 
am absolutely exasperated, because this is entirely unnecessary."
The president 
foreshadowed Boehner's comments that he wouldn't negotiate with 
Republicans in their attempts to tie government funding to Obamacare 
changes. Doing so, the president said, would set a dangerous precedent.
"If we get in the habit 
where a few folks, an extremist wing of one party ... are allowed to 
extort concessions based on a threat of undermining the full faith and 
credit of the United States, then any president that comes after me ... 
will find themselves unable to govern effectively," Obama said. "And 
that is not something that I'm going to allow to happen."
GOP spending measures unlikely to advance
Fresh off having sent 
four separate proposals tying funding the government to either delaying 
or defunding Obamacare -- each of which was rejected by the Senate -- 
the GOP-led House continued to work Wednesday, albeit on another plan 
Democrats say won't go anywhere.
A day after an initial 
effort failed because the short-term proposals comprising a tiny portion
 of the overall federal budget lacked the necessary two-thirds majority 
support due to Democratic opposition, the House passed -- with majority 
support -- bills to fund national parks, the National Institutes of 
Health and District of Columbia operations.
The incremental approach
 pushed by Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas seeks to pressure Democrats to approve
 spending for programs that Republicans like, but not Obamacare.
Yet Obama has signaled 
he'd veto those measures should they reach his desk. That's unlikely, 
given that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has dismissed the GOP 
approach as "reckless and irresponsible."
While expressing 
openness to budgetary negotiations generally, Democrats have said 
they'll only talk after Congress passes a clean spending measure. Both 
Democrats and Republicans say such a bill would pass the House with 
support from the Democratic minority and moderate Republicans.
So far, Boehner has 
succumbed to pressure from the tea party right to avoid a vote that 
would pass something without causing some harm to the health care 
reforms.
One problem is that 
conservative House Republicans from home districts with no realistic 
Democratic challenge feel emboldened to pursue a more extremist ideology
 backed by their supporters, he said.
"More people say raise 
the debt ceiling and fight the health care debate somewhere else," CNN 
Chief National Correspondent John King noted. "But there's enough here, 
if you think of a Republican going home to his district, there's enough 
here to understand why the Republicans think they're on safe ground 
dragging this out."
Decision to raise debt ceiling, or risk default, looms
The looming debt crisis could pose even more headaches, and confrontation, in the coming weeks.
Failing to raise it may 
mean a U.S. default on its debt, something Obama stressed in Wednesday's
 White House meeting that the country can't afford to do, according to 
Reid.
Obama offered no 
indication that he'll budge. Noting that such Republican brinkmanship in
 2011 led to the first-ever downgrade of the U.S. credit rating, the 
president said Tuesday he "will not negotiate over Congress' 
responsibility to pay bills it's already racked up."
Writing the same day in 
USA Today, Boehner dug in his heels on the issue, saying "there is no 
way Congress can or should pass such a bill without spending cuts and 
reforms to deal with the debt and deficit."
Still, that crisis is 
still a few weeks away. The government shutdown is the one currently 
affecting hundreds of thousands of furloughed government workers, not to
 mention millions of others who rely on government programs, visit 
national parks and have some other type of interaction with affected 
programs.
One moderate Republican 
who has backed a clean spending measure, Rep. Michael Grimm of New York,
 said that "both sides have dug in." Democrats, who he said "won't even 
have a discussion," put House Republicans in a tight spot where they 
feel compelled to hold their ground or else "set a bad precedent that 
the Senate would be somewhat dictating how the House runs."
But if Democrats agreed 
to listen, Grimm expressed optimism "that we would put a package 
together and solve the problems at once, so we can get the government 
funded, stop the shutdown, and also deal with the debt ceiling so we 
don't have another crisis a week or two away from now."
Pelosi said that scores 
of Democrats have reluctantly offered to back a plan to fund the entire 
government at a figure that's been bandied about by Republicans, albeit 
well below what her party members want. The other option would be to 
reconcile budgets passed by both chambers earlier this year in a 
conference committee, as is Washington custom.
But what Democrats won't
 stand for, Pelosi said, is GOP legislators shuttering the government 
due to their opposition to Obamacare, which previously passed through 
Congress and withstood a Supreme Court challenge.
"That's not what our 
Constitution had in mind: that if you don't like something, you threaten
 to shut down the government," the California Democrat said. "It's not 
that kind of system."
A blow to the economy
The shutdown of the government -- the country's largest employer -- isn't happening all at once.
Federal employees who 
are considered essential will continue working. Those deemed 
non-essential -- up to 800,000 -- could be furloughed, unsure when 
they'll be able to work or get paid again.
The shutdown could cost 
the still-struggling U.S. economy about $1 billion a week in pay lost by
 furloughed federal workers. And that's only the tip of the iceberg.
While many agencies have
 reserve funds and contingency plans that would give them some 
short-term leeway, the economic effect would snowball as the shutdown 
continued.
The total economic 
impact is likely to be at least 10 times greater than the simple 
calculation of lost wages of federal workers, said Brian Kessler, 
economist with Moody's Analytics. His firm estimates that a three- to 
four-week shutdown would cost the economy about $55 billion.
And it's already had 
political ramifications extending beyond the United States. On 
Wednesday, Obama canceled planned visits next week to Malaysia and the 
Philippines as part of an Asian swing that will include a summit of the 
Association of Southeast Asian Nations on Bali. Obama will still attend 
the ASEAN summit, his office said.
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment